Data CollectionData InterpretationData ProcessingLimitations

A GPR’s “Fuzzy Zone” | Why it is difficult to locate shallow targets with Ground Penetrating Radar

By November 8, 2017 2 Comments

What is the GPR’s fuzzy zone? This is the shallow zone that is difficult to image with a GPR. This means that when the GPR puts out a signal, there is a portion of the immediate subsurface that is almost un-imagible (so I made up a word!). Many of LearnGPR’s students come to me with frustration as to why there is an area directly below the surface that they cannot locate buried targets. I tell them that the size of this zone will vary and will sometimes be smaller and sometimes larger.

Here are three reasons why this zone exists:

1) Antenna Spacing – the distance between the antennas has an affect on the size of the fuzzy zone. The greater the spacing between the transmitter and the receiver, the larger the fuzzy zone.

2) Wavelength – The length of the wave (from crest to crest) will effect the size of the fuzzy zone. The longer the wavelength, the larger the fuzzy zone. This is why it can be difficult to estimate thickness of 4 cm asphalt using a 250 MHz antenna.

3) Pulse duration – This refers to how long the antenna puts out a pulse. The longer the time it takes an antenna to put out a pulse, the larger the fuzzy zone. When the pulse is emitted by the transmitter, it will inundate the receiver with energy. This can mask the first X nanoseconds of response where X is the pulse duration.

All three of these reasons are related to antenna size and frequency. The lower the frequency, the larger the antenna. Antenna spacing is generally the same distance as the size of the antenna itself. So a larger antenna will require a greater spacing between transmitter and receiver creating a larger fuzzy zone. A lower frequency will create signals with longer wavelengths and thus a larger fuzzy zone. Finally, the larger the antenna, the longer the pulse duration.

So lower frequency antenna will have larger fuzzy zones. As examples:

a 2600 MHz antenna will have around a 1 cm fuzzy zone
a 400 MHz antenna will have around a 15 cm fuzzy zone
a 200 MHz antenna will have around a 30 cm fuzzy zone

So, don’t try and image a 4 cm pipe buried 5 cm below the ground surface with a 200 MHz antenna. While the fuzzy zone for a given antenna is not an area where responses are unattainable, but it is an area that is more difficult to image. If the locations of deep and shallow targets are required for a project, you may want to consider using multiple antenna.

******* WHAT IS LEARNGPR*******

LearnGPR is a training platform for Ground Penetrating Radar that helps civil engineers, utility locators, and others learn about GPR through fun and engaging courses and coaching.

******* FREE TRAINING FROM LEARNGPR*******

Go to http://learngpr.com to sign up for our free Introductory Training Video on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR).

******* CONNECT WITH LEARNGPR*******

Want to learn more about GPR? Follow us at:
http://facebook.com/learngpr
http://youtube.com/learngpr
http://twitter.com/learngpr (tag your GPR questions with #learngpr)
http://instagram.com/learngpr (tag us on your pics to get featured)
http://linkedin.com/company/learngpr
http://medium.com/@learngpr

Join the discussion 2 Comments

  • PAVLU says:

    Hello Dan
    I am Teo ,teacher at the civil-eng. university in Bucharest,Romania.
    Please tell me what do you think about PROCEQ sad on their new GPR ?Can a antenna by from 0,2 to 4 ghz?
    if they are right then there will be no fuzzy zone
    best regards

    • dpbigman says:

      Hi Teo!

      Thanks for commenting and asking a question. I haven’t had the chance of using the new Proceq system so I can’t comment on the quality. Their system is a stepped frequency continuous wave so like other system using this strategy it will have a wider band. I look forward to playing with the unit in the near future.